Member of National Examinations Appeals Tribunal (Non-Advocate) Position at JSC 2026
Judicial Service Commission · Nairobi · Onsite
Job Description
The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) has announced a vacancy for the position of Member, National Examinations Appeals Tribunal (Non-Advocate). Qualified professionals with experience in examinations or education are invited to apply for this prestigious appointment.
This opportunity is ideal for individuals with strong analytical, communication, and dispute resolution skills who wish to contribute to the administration of justice in Kenya.
Employer
Judicial Service Commission (JSC)
The Judicial Service Commission was established under Article 171 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010. Its mandate is to promote and facilitate the independence and accountability of the Judiciary and ensure the efficient, effective, and transparent administration of justice.
Job Summary
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Employer | Judicial Service Commission (JSC) |
| Position | Member, National Examinations Appeals Tribunal (Non-Advocate) |
| Job Reference Number | V/No.47/2026 |
| Number of Posts | One (1) |
| Employment Type | Tribunal Appointment |
| Application Deadline | 13 August 2026 at 5:00 PM |
Position Details
Member, National Examinations Appeals Tribunal (Non-Advocate)
Job Reference Number: V/No.47/2026
Number of Posts: One (1)
Minimum Qualifications
Applicants must meet the following minimum requirements:
Hold a relevant bachelor's degree from an institution recognized in Kenya.
Have at least ten (10) years of experience in marking examinations or possess knowledge and experience in education.
Must not have been an employee of the Kenya National Examinations Council (KNEC) at any time within the preceding five (5) years before appointment.
Qualification and experience in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) will be an added advantage.
Possess high moral character and integrity in accordance with Chapter Six of the Constitution of Kenya.
Core Competencies
Successful candidates should demonstrate:
Oral and written communication skills
Excellent conceptual and analytical skills
Strong interpersonal skills
Report writing skills
Research skills
High attention to detail
Sound independent judgment
Terms of Service
Under Section 40(c) and (1A) of the Kenya National Examinations Council Act (Cap. 214A), a Member of the National Examinations Appeals Tribunal shall:
Serve a three (3) year term.
Be eligible for reappointment for one additional three-year term.
Remuneration
Members of the Tribunal shall receive such allowances or other remuneration as the Judicial Service Commission, in consultation with the Salaries and Remuneration Commission, may determine.
Required Application Documents
Applicants should complete the online application and upload soft copies of the following documents:
Application letter
Detailed and updated Curriculum Vitae (CV), including background information such as community service, financial discipline, pro bono activity (if any), involvement as a party in litigation, involvement in political activity (including financial contributions to political parties, if any), criminal record, professional engagement, three professional references, and two character references
Names of three (3) professional references
Names of two (2) character references
Professional certificates
Academic certificates
Academic transcripts
Testimonials
Certificate of Admission to the Roll of Advocate (where applicable)
Recent coloured passport-size photograph
Five (5) sample professional writings, including judgments, court submissions, scholarly writings, or other professional publications authored by the applicant
How to Apply
Interested and qualified candidates should:
Complete the online Application for Employment Form available through the Judicial Service Commission jobs portal.
Upload all the required supporting documents through the online application system.
Applications must reach the Judicial Service Commission not later than 13 August 2026 at 5:00 PM.
Important Notes
Only shortlisted and successful candidates will be contacted.
Canvassing in any form will lead to automatic disqualification.
Successful candidates will be required to submit valid clearance certificates from:
Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA)
Higher Education Loans Board (HELB)
Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI)
Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC)
A recognized Credit Reference Bureau (CRB)
Relevant professional body
Shortlisted candidates must produce original National Identity Cards, academic certificates, professional certificates, and transcripts during the interview.
Presenting fake documents or false information is a criminal offence.
The Judicial Service Commission is committed to fair competition, merit-based recruitment, equal employment opportunities, and representation of Kenya's diverse communities in accordance with Article 232 of the Constitution.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many vacancies are available?
The Judicial Service Commission is recruiting one (1) Member, National Examinations Appeals Tribunal (Non-Advocate).
What qualifications are required?
Applicants must hold a relevant bachelor's degree, have at least 10 years of experience in marking examinations or education, meet Chapter Six integrity requirements, and satisfy the other eligibility criteria stated in the advertisement.
How long is the appointment?
The appointment is for three (3) years, with eligibility for one further three-year term.
When is the application deadline?
Applications must be submitted on or before 13 August 2026 at 5:00 PM.
Boost your application
AscendurePro members win more interviews with these tools. Free to start, no credit card.
🧠 AI Insights for this role
Resume → Job Fit Analysis
Get a fit score, keyword gaps, and specific resume edits tailored to this role.
Check my fitLikely Interview Questions
Show prep pack ↓
LIKELY QUESTIONS - How does your experience in marking examinations or in the education sector prepare you to serve effectively on the National Examinations Appeals Tribunal? - What do you understand to be the role and mandate of the National Examinations Appeals Tribunal under the KNEC framework, and how should a tribunal member approach that mandate? - This is a non-advocate role. How would you contribute to fair, legally sound, and practical decisions without being a practising advocate? - Describe how you would assess an appeal involving alleged irregularities in marking, moderation, or release of examination results. - What steps would you take to ensure independence, impartiality, and avoidance of conflict of interest, especially given the sensitivity of national examinations? - Tell us about a time you had to analyze complex information, weigh competing evidence, and arrive at an objective conclusion. - ADR is listed as an added advantage. How would you use dispute resolution skills to support efficient and just handling of appeals? - This role requires strong report writing and sound judgment. How would you structure a clear, reasoned tribunal determination that can withstand scrutiny? BEHAVIOURAL QUESTIONS - Tell us about a time you handled a highly sensitive dispute involving students, parents, teachers, or another education stakeholder. Model approach: Situation - Briefly describe the dispute and why it was sensitive. Task - Explain your responsibility to resolve or manage it fairly. Action - Show how you gathered facts, listened to all sides, remained neutral, applied policy, and communicated the outcome clearly. Result - End with a fair resolution, preserved trust, and a lesson on balancing empathy with objectivity. - Describe an occasion when you had to make a difficult decision with incomplete or conflicting information. Model approach: Situation - Set out the context and why the information gap mattered. Task - State the decision you were accountable for. Action - Explain how you verified sources, identified the key issues, applied standards or rules, consulted appropriately without abdicating judgment, and documented your reasoning. Result - Highlight a defensible decision, reduced risk of error, and strengthened confidence in your judgment. - Give an example of when you wrote a report or recommendation on a complex matter for senior decision-makers. Model approach: Situation - Describe the issue and audience. Task - Clarify what the report needed to achieve. Action - Show how you researched the matter, organized evidence, separated facts from opinion, wrote concise findings, and made practical recommendations. Result - Emphasize that the report informed action, was well received, or improved decision quality. - Tell us about a time you had to maintain integrity or independence under pressure. Model approach: Situation - Explain the pressure, such as influence from a senior person, stakeholder, or public expectation. Task - State your duty to remain impartial and compliant with rules. Action - Describe how you relied on principles, disclosed any concerns, refused improper influence, and kept a proper record. Result - Show that the process remained credible and that your integrity protected the institution and outcome. SMART QUESTIONS TO ASK - How does the Tribunal currently balance procedural fairness, timeliness, and the public sensitivity that often surrounds examination disputes? - What types of appeals most commonly come before the Tribunal, and what capabilities distinguish the most effective members? - How are members oriented on the applicable legal framework, standards of evidence, confidentiality, and decision-writing expectations? - What is the working relationship between the Tribunal, JSC, and KNEC, and how is independence safeguarded in practice? - What would success look like for the person appointed in the first 12 months of the term? RED FLAGS TO WATCH FOR - Vague answers about independence, conflict management, or how the Tribunal remains impartial when dealing with KNEC-related matters. - Signs of weak case management, such as unclear timelines, backlog issues, poor administrative support, or no defined approach to handling appeals efficiently. - Overemphasis on informal influence, political sensitivity, or "practical considerations" without equal emphasis on evidence, due process, and reasoned decisions.
Want full STAR-format answers tailored to your background? Use the Interview Simulator.
Adjacent Career Paths
Roles you'd also qualify for based on this posting's requirements:
- Education Quality Assurance Officer — The role matches deep experience in examinations, analytical review, reporting, and education sector judgment.
- Academic Registrar — A strong candidate would be suited to managing assessment processes, academic records, and examination-related appeals.
- Alternative Dispute Resolution Mediator — The position values dispute resolution, impartial decision-making, and strong communication skills that transfer well to mediation.
- Curriculum and Assessment Specialist — Experience in marking examinations and education knowledge aligns with designing, reviewing, and evaluating assessments.